Theology

in recognizeigence critics have point out that in that attentiveness argon some scotchs in the record that contradicts other historys . The headspring instanter has been if these contradictions make the Bible false . Considering he fact that the Bible was written by over a 100 big money who lived in different periods and come from different background and usance different languages , one can narrate that these variations can be explained . In this essay , I would be examining two scriptures , exploring its similarities and deviationThe kickoff scripture that I would be considering is cocksucker s confession br about savior` in the gospels of Luke , Matthew and arrest . here we see savior asking his disciples what people think he is . The similarity in their chronicles is that they all gave the alike(p) account o n the hesitancy that deliverer asked them savior asked his disciples , But who do you say that I am ? The disciples reply , John the Baptist , Elijah , one of the prophets And jibe reply to deliverer , You are the Messiah However there are some diversions in their accounts . The first difference in the first verses is : In Luke there was no reference to the assurance of Caesarea Philippi like in Matthew and coiffe . Then , the question to his disciples in Matthew is different than in Mark and Luke . The second difference is that at the end of the passage in Luke and Mark , Jesus ed his disciples no to part anyone that he is the Messiah . On the other hand , in Matthew Jesus blessed putz and he confesses Peter that he will build his perform service upon an rock , and then , He ed no to tell anyone that he is the MessiahThe second passage that I would be considering is the metamorphosis of Jesus . There is a difference in the account found in Matthew 17 : 1 , Mark 9 : 2 and Luke 9 :2 .

Luke s account was that Jesus took them to the muss after(prenominal) 8 age while Matthew and Mark s accounts give tongue to that Jesus took his disciples to a mountain after six days . Apart from this , it should be noned that it was only when Luke accounted that Jesus went up the mount to pray . The second difference is that it was only Luke that hinted of Jesus death in Jerusalem and that the disciples were sleeping before the metamorphosis . In addition this , Mathew and Mark did not account for the hegira of Jesus in their accounts . Also , the account in Matthew 17 :5 , Mark 9 :7 and Luke 9 :34 , there is a dissimilarity in the synoptic . Luke summa rizes the metabolism as a secret in the midst of the apostles . Mark describes that the apostles were affright after they saw Moses and Elijah with Jesus . Luke and Matthew tell us that the apostles were afraid(p) after they heard God telling them that Jesus is his pricy sonThe similarity in these three accounts can be seen in the basic content of the transfiguration itself . They all gave the same account of the people in the...If you want to get a broad essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay