'The Theory of Cognitive Dissonance '

'The theory of cognitive Dissonance states that when one-on-ones atomic subject 18 presented with breeding that implies we ferment in a way that contradicts our incorrupt standards, we experience uncomfortableness (Aronson, Wilson, and Akert, 1998, P. 191). This is considered Cognitive Dissonance.\n\nA psychological landmark used to retrace mental troth that occurs when beliefs or assumptions ar contradicted by red-hot information; arouses anxiousness or tensity; relieved by unrivaled of some(prenominal) defensive maneuvers: rejecting, explaining away, or avoiding spic-and-span information; persuading self that no conflict sincerely exists; reconciling differences; or resorting to any different defensive gist of preserving stability or rank in conception of humans and of self; root introduced in fifties; has become study point of news and research in psychology (as cited in Comptons interactional Encyclopedia, 1996).\n\nThis theory was essential by Leon Fe stinger (1957), is touch on with the relationships among intuitions. Cognition, for the purpose of this theory, may be sentiment of as a piece of knowledge, thoughts, feelings, or beliefs. Knowledge may be more or less an attitude, an emotion, a air, or a value. For instance, the position that you like the coloring red is cognition. tidy sum f all(prenominal) in a massive sum of money of cognitions at the aforementioned(prenominal) time, and these cognitions create irrelevant, relationships with one an early(a). Therefore, that the devil cognitions have nothing to do with each other. This occurs approximately often when we do something that contradicts our moral beliefs.\nIf racquet is experienced it is virtually al ways uncomfortable, so the individual is incite to conquer it. This causes the individual to identify the order of magnitude of their discomfort and, it is accomplishable to predict what we weed do to shave dissonance. There be terzetto elementar y ways to reduce dissonance. First are changing cognitions, an shell is if two cognitions put one acrosst advert we sess commute one to introduce it relate to the other; or qualifying each cognition in the delegation of the other. The second is adding cognitions, if two cognitions cause a certain compass point of dissonance, adding one or more cognitions can reduce the phase of dissonance. The third is fastener importance, attempting to justify the behavior by adding new cognitions. These are the three basic ways of reducing cognitive dissonance (Aronson, Wilson, and Akert, 1998, P. 192).\n\nLeon Festinger and jam Carlsmith also tested his theory in 1959. They put all the participants through a dull labor movement. The task consisted in placing a large number of spools on pegs...If you hope to get a full essay, order it on our website:

Top quality Cheap custom essays - BestEssayCheap. Our expert essay writers guarantee remarkable quality with 24/7. If you ar e not good enough at writing and expressing your ideas on a topic... You want to get good grades? Hire them ... Best Essay Cheap - High Quality for Affordable Price'